acrysof restor iols (alcon inc)
Structured Review
Acrysof Restor Iols, supplied by alcon inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/acrysof+restor/acrysof+restor+iol/pm39972278-44-12-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Functional Results and Photic Phenomena with new Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Article Snippet: Using this device Attia et al. recorded median binocular uncorrected and distance-corrected reading acuities of 0.18logMAR at intermediate distance (80cm) and of 0.05logMAR and 0.01logMAR at near distance (40cm) with Article Title: Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma—A Systematic Review Article Snippet: Diffractive MFIOLs, such as the Article Title: Functional results and photic phenomena with new extended-depth-of-focus intraocular Lens Article Snippet: Using this device Attia et al. recorded median binocular uncorrected and distance-corrected reading acuities of 0.18logMAR at intermediate Article Title: Threshold limit of postoperative astigmatism for patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Article Snippet: Hayashi et al.19 found that with 0.50 D, 1.00D, 1.50D, and 2.00D of simulated astigmatism, distance visual acuity was significantly reduced at each magnitude of astigmatism with both a C3.00 D add and a C4.00 D add Article Title: Comparison of visual outcomes between bilateral trifocal intraocular lenses and combined bifocal intraocular lenses with different near addition. Article Snippet: Purpose To compare outcomes in patients implanted bilaterally with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with patients implanted with bifocal IOLs having different near addition in each eye.. Study design Nonrandomized comparative study.. Methods Seventy-eight patients scheduled for multifocal IOL implantation were divided into a trifocal group (n=32) implanted bilaterally with trifocal IOLs (Alcon TFNT00), and a combined bifocal group (n=46) implanted with a bifocal IOL with +3.0 diopter (D) addition in the dominant eye and +4.0D addition in the nondominant eye. Extraction:Article Title: Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction Article Snippet: A higher proportion of monofocal group participants did not undergo second eye surgery because of problems in the first eye 8/127 (6%) compared to 2/134 (1%) Selective outcome reporting Unclear risk Judgement comment: no access to trial protocol and trial not registered Ji 2013 Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group Multicentre: no Participants Baseline characteristics Multifocal: AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon Laboratories • Number of people (eyes) randomised: NR • Number of people (eyes) excluded after randomisation: NR • Number of people (eyes) lost to follow-up: NR • Number of people (eyes) analysed (at longest time point): 24 (30) • Mean age in years (range): 63 (52 to 71) • % female: 58 • Ethnic group: NR Monofocal: AcrySof Natural, Alcon Laboratories • Number of people (eyes) randomised: NR • Number of people (eyes) excluded after randomisation: NR • Number of people (eyes) lost to follow-up: NR • Number of people (eyes) analysed (at longest time point): 27 (34) • Mean age in years (range): 63 (55 to 75) • % female: 56 • Ethnic group: NR Inclusion criteria: aged 50 to 75 years; age-associated cataracts. .. Exclusion criteria: corneal astigmatism > 1.5 D; glaucoma; retinal abnormalities; surgical complications Pretreatment: NR Interventions Intervention characteristics Multifocal • Name of lens: |
